Court awards paralyzed plaintiff $4,500,000 for cost of future care
In reasons for judgment released today, the court in Warick v. Diwell, 2017 BCSC 68, awarded the plaintiff $4,500,000 for the cost of future care. The facts in Warick we…
Read moreAcquaint yourself with McQuarrie’s recent work through our latest articles, podcasts, and knowledge videos.
In reasons for judgment released today, the court in Warick v. Diwell, 2017 BCSC 68, awarded the plaintiff $4,500,000 for the cost of future care. The facts in Warick we…
Read more
In reasons for judgment released today, the court in Brown v. Mitchell, 2017 BCSC 125, awarded $120,000 in non-pecuniary damages to a 24 year-old plaintiff who suffered f…
Read more
In reasons for judgment released today, the court in Gill v. Wal-Mart Corporation, 2017 BCSC 135, ordered the plaintiff to sign an “IME consent form” as part of his atten…
Read more
In reasons for judgment released today, the court in Rieveley v. Doe, 2017 BCSC 202, rejected ICBC’s argument that the plaintiff should be barred from pursuing a hit-and-…
Read more
In reasons for judgment released today, the District Registrar in Wynia v. Soviskov, 2017 BCSC 195, considered the novel issue of whether a defendant is liable to pay to …
Read more
In reasons for judgment released last Friday, the court in Jamal v. Kemery-Higgins, 2017 BCSC 213, awarded the plaintiff $95,000 in non-pecuniary damages for chronic pain…
Read more
In reasons released earlier today the court in Tournier v. Ruckle, 2017 BCSC 308 dismissed the defendant’s application to compel the plaintiff to attend an independent me…
Read more
In reasons for judgment released today, the court in Catling v. Poteryko, 2017 BCSC 311, awarded the plaintiff $80,000 in non-pecuniary damages for soft tissue injuries w…
Read more
In reasons for judgment released today, the court in Huang v. Bertelsen, 2015 BCSC 2650, ordered the plaintiff to attend an independent medical examination with a defence…
Read more